Received: from mp.cs.niu.edu (root@mp.cs.niu.edu [131.156.1.2]) by library.wustl.edu (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id AAA22747; Fri, 22 Jan 1999 00:02:33 -0600 (CST) Received: by mp.cs.niu.edu (8.9.1/8.9.2) id UAA19220 for nepal-dist; Thu, 21 Jan 1999 20:25:16 -0600 (CST) Received: by mp.cs.niu.edu (8.9.1/8.9.2) id UAA19216 for nepal-list; Thu, 21 Jan 1999 20:25:15 -0600 (CST) Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1999 20:25:15 -0600 (CST) Message-Id: <199901220225.UAA19216@mp.cs.niu.edu> Reply-to: The Nepal Digest <NEPAL@cs.niu.edu> From: The Editor <NEPAL-REQUEST@cs.niu.edu> Sender: "Rajpal J.P. Singh" <A10RJS1@cs.niu.edu> Subject: The Nepal Digest - Jan 20, 1998 (3 Magh 2055 BkSm) To: <NEPAL@cs.niu.edu> Content-Type: text Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 296
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
% N N EEEEEE PPPPPP AA L %
% NN N E P P A A L %
% N N N EEEE P P A A L %
% N N N E PPPPPP AAAAAA L %
% N NN E P A A L %
% N N EEEEEE P A A LLLLLL %
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
The Nepal Digest Wednesday Jan 20, 1999: Magh 3 2055BS: Year8 Volume82 Issue1
HAPPY NEW YEAR 1999 !!!
Today's Topics (partial list):
Engineering Job opening
Regarding Depo-Provera
News about community radio
RE: IRAQ PROTEST
Book Review IV
Suggestions wanted
NC, UML, NSP, RPP
******************************************************************************
* TND (The Nepal Digest) Editorial Board *
* -------------------------------------- *
* *
* The Nepal Digest: General Information tnd@nepal.org *
* Chief Editor: Rajpal JP Singh a10rjs1@mp.cs.niu.edu *
* (Open Position) *
* Editorial Columnist: Pramod K. Mishra pkm@acpub.duke.edu *
* Sports Correspondent: Avinaya Rana avinayar@touro.edu *
* Co-ordinating Director - Australia Chapter (TND Foundation) *
* Dr. Krishna B. Hamal HamalK@dist.gov.au *
* Co-ordinating Director - Canada Chapter (TND Foundation) *
* Anil Shrestha SHRESTHA@CROP.UOGUELPH.CA *
* SCN Correspondent: Open Position *
* *
* TND Archives: http://library.wustl.edu/~listmgr/tnd/ *
* TND Foundation: http://www.nepal.org tnd@nepal.org *
* WebSlingers: Open Position tnd@nepal.org *
* *
* +++++ Food For Thought +++++ *
* *
* "Heros are the ones who give a bit of themselves to the community" *
* "Democracy perishes among the silent crowd" -Sirdar_Khalifa *
* *
******************************************************************************
******************************************************************
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 1998 19:35:29 -0800
From: Pawan Agrawal <pawan@cisco.com>
To: The Nepal Digest <NEPAL@cs.niu.edu>
Subject: Engineering Job opening
My company has a need for Electrical or Computer Engineer (BS or MS
grad). F1/H1 should be OK. If interested, please contact me with your
resume.
Thank you.
Pawan Agrawal
******************************************************************
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 1998 12:10:26 -0500 (EST)
From: Mohan C. Thakuri <thakurim@VAX.CS.HSCSYR.EDU>
Subject: Regarding Depo-Provera
To: NEPAL@cs.niu.edu
I read with great sadness the story of Sita Devi, who died shortly after
receiving an injection of Depo-Provera, a depot injection of
Medroxyprogesterone acetate, used for contraception. However, I feel
obliged as a physician, to clarify certain things regarding this event.
First, from the description of the event it appears to me that this lady
had an anaphylactic reaction, a form of severe allergic reaction which is
unpredictable and could happen to anyone with any injection of any drug.
It has been well described with this particular preparation. However,
what makes this so sad is the fact that this death could have been easily
prevented with appropriate treatment. I do not see how one could hold the
person giving the injection liable for this. However, it is criminal to
give injections of this sort and not be prepared to counteract
anaphylaxis, which requires the use of a drug called epinephrine.
Depo-Provera is not banned in the USA. In fact it is used fairly
commonly, since it provides convenient, once every three-month
contraception. In fact, it is well-suited for women who would find it
hard to follow rigourous instructions that come with some other methods.
Low dose oral contraceptives are avilable in Nepal at a far cheaper price
and in my opinion are no less dangerous. Would be very hard to convince
many women to take it on a daily basis wihtout fail. Barrier method is
very safe, however, has the inconvenience and does not work well if not
used as instructed.
I despise open advertisement of pharmaceuticals without details regarding
their side-effects and proper use. However, contraception in the
developing countries is a complex issue, politically and at the
individual level. A lot is involved in making this decision for the woman
and the physicians. I would encourage Ms Aiko Joshi to find more detailed
instruction in this matter before completely rejecting this drug, which
provides women with a wider choice. When it comes to temporary
contraception, there is no ideal safe and effective method.
To end my note, what happened was extremely tragic. This death was
preventable. May be companies like CRS could provide health care facilities
with simple, life-saving drugs like epinephrine, so that people like Mr
Yadav do not get arrested for trying to serve people. May be health care
workers like him could be trained better and may be CRS should be
involved in this.
This should not be taken to mean that I endorse one or the other product.
I'm simply forwarding my opinion that the choices in this regard are not
easy to make. Burden, unfortunately, lies on the individual person as to
how best to make use of avilable technology.
Thank you.
Mohan Chand.
******************************************************************
Date: December 21, 1998
To: The Nepal Digest <nepal@cs.niu.edu>
Subject: King's Illness
Source: People's Review
Confucius's teaching and the King's illness
BY RABINDRA MISHRA
Recently, a friend of mine in America e-mailed me an essay written by this
year's Nobel Prize winner in economics, Amartya Sen. The essay, Human
Rights and Asian Values: What Lee Kuan Yew and Li Peng don't
understand about Asia, was quite long and he had asked me to read it at my
leisure.
Finally, I managed to do so yesterday. The essay was undoubtedly a
scholarly piece and was quite enlightening. The reason I am mentioning this
here is not that I want to discuss Sen's thesis. Rather I want to borrow a
piece of dialogue between Confucius (551-479 BC), a famous Chinese
philosopher and an educator, and his close follower, Zilu, which Sen has
quoted in his essay. Zilu is said to have asked Confucius "how to serve a
prince," and he reportedly replies: "Tell him the truth even if it offends him."
As I read these lines I started to think about the Nepalese royal household
at the back of my mind.
My unintentional inclination to relate the reply of Confucius to our royal
household may well have been prompted by the recent health problem of
the King. At present, the King is the only figure the overwhelming majority
of Nepalese view with genuine respect and regard despite all the mistakes
he is supposed to have made during the panchayat era. However, as to the
information of his health, the same loyal subjects were disallowed from
knowing his true state throughout the whole check-up and treatment period.
It appeared to me that there was no one to tell the King that the public was
dismayed by such an approach.
The press was given only a minimum of information and neither palace
officials nor doctors involved in the treatment would give any further details.
Palace officials would say that they couldn't add by themselves to what the
doctors had told them and the doctors would say that they were not
supposed to speak. For example, no one still knows whether the King had
the ischemia in the right coronary artery or in the left, which is considered
more serious. A news story of such public concern needs enough
information and a reasonable length to be a lead or one of the major stories
of the day. The reluctance of the palace to provide adequate information
resulted in many of the reports being written like an obituary with the greater
part of the stories dealing with King's personal and family details.
I was wondering who could be responsible for such an unnecessary and
unwelcome approach? His Majesty himself or his Bhai-bhardars?
I am sure none of the remaining monarchs in the world, who have witnessed
the fall of many unpopular royal households, would do anything that may
shorten the life of the royal institution. No doubt, like all human beings,
monarchs too have self interests but as the disgraced former Prime Minister,
Marich Man Singh Shrestha, once said a monarch, unlike political leaders,
has a long-term interest because, Shrestha's contention was, a monarch
wants the continuation of the institution for his children and grandchildren.
For a political leader, Shrestha said, a portfolio matters only until he holds
the post. It sounds entirely convincing to me.
Therefore, I doubt that the King, who is well aware of his growing
popularity, may have instructed to do so, which was certain to disappoint
the press and the public.
In any royal household Bhai-bhardars play a great role in building and
destroying the image of a monarch. Palace officials probably play even a
greater role as they are the ones who act as a bridge between the public
and the monarch on a day-to-day basis. A monarch has to rely on his
advisors and officials in taking the majority of decisions and if they get things
wrong the monarch cannot get it right. And if, at times, the monarch is
insistent on something wrong it is their duty to correct him. So here comes
the application of Confucius's answer to Zilu. Looking back at the history of
our royal palace, it is difficult to believe that the King's advisors and officials
are getting things right for themselves and, consequently, for the King.
It is the duty of those who work for the King to try to get things right and
"tell him [the monarch] the truth even it offends him." It must be a difficult
job working as royal officials but those who have faced that challenge with
boldness and sincerity have always earned respect, unlike most of our
palace officials who are always viewed with suspicion and, by many, with
disregard. I remember a group of people celebrating the restoration of
democracy in 1990 chanting "death to the King's secretaries." When I
asked them why they had chosen that particular slogan when everyone else
was demanding death to panchayat leaders, one of them said: "they [the
secretaries] are the ones who have misled the King." He was not entirely
wrong.
In panchayat days, the palace secretaries considered themselves more
powerful even than the prime minister, which they actually were. They also
behaved with absolute arrogance. Now, they are powerless but they still
seem to treat the King as their personal asset rather than that of the public
(Probably they get a sense of security by doing so). If this situation has
arisen due to reasons beyond their control they should tell the King that
unnecessary interference was hindering their duties as a result of which a
gap was being created between the monarch and the public.
And His Majesty should respond to such situations because in case of a
crisis it is the public who will rise to save the monarchy not the
Bhai-bhardars.
And, finally, I would like to borrow another line from a recently broadcast
BBC documentary, A Portrait of the Prince of Wales, which was produced
to mark the Prince's fiftieth birthday. To conclude the programme, the
presenter quotes a piece of advice given by the uncle of Prince Charles and
says:
the Prince remembers what his uncle wrote to him - "Realise," he said, "how
fickle public support can be. It has to be earned over again every year."
Absolutely. The public support for the King in Nepal is very high at the
moment but this should, in no way, be taken for granted. To maintain it,
neither the King nor anyone around him should be allowed to do anything
which could break that "fickle" creature called public support.
******************************************************************
Date: Sun, 20 Dec 1998 06:56:19 +0545 (NPT)
From: sinhas@mos.com.np (Pratyoush Onta
Subject: news about community radio
NEWS FROM RADIO SAGARMATHA - NOVEMBER/DECEMBER 1998
Namaste and greetings,
Things are going very well for community radio in Nepal. As a friend or at
least an acquaintance of Radio Sagarmatha, the first independent community
radio in South Asia, I thought you might be interested in an update about
our activities.
The words of the moment seem to be opportunity and growth. It is a very
interesting and important time for community radio, both in Nepal and in
other parts of Asia. There's a lot of excitement and interest, stretching
from local groups who want to start their own stations to international
development agencies and visiting journalists wanting to know more about
this new radio experiment in the Kathmandu Valley. Even if people don't
always know what community radio means, the idea of small radio stations at
the community level seems like something worth learning about to more and
more people.
For staff and listeners alike, the big news is that Radio Sagarmatha's
broadcast license was recently modified to allow for a thirteen hour
broadcast service. In September of 1998, after eighteen months of
broadcasting only two hours a day, Sagarmatha is now on-air daily from 6:30
to 9:30, morning and evening.
New volunteers are working alongside a small core of producers, gradually
introducing new programme formats. A couple of weeks ago, a daily local
events bulletin was started. Heard every evening, Haalchaal examines events
from the past day and announcements relevant to the next. The program is
driven a group of four volunteers. Also in the evenings, a new series of
weekly programme serials using musical poetry, fables and other traditional
media are being adapted for radio and gradually introduced. In October,
Radio Sagarmatha began live thirty minutes re-broadcasts of the BBC Nepali
service, a combination of news and public affairs.
The station's strategy for sponsored and co-produced programming is
successfully tapping the need for local information media and discussion
fora. As awareness of community radio increases amongst local and
international groups, so is the demand for access to both live and
studio-produced programming. By the beginning of 1999, Radio Sagarmatha
will launch the Clean Air Campaign, a daily bulletin focused on air
pollution problems. The Clean Air Campaign will make daily reports from
different locations around the Kathmandu Valley from an audio-equipped and
clean-running Safa Tempo, sponsored by the Danish government.
Also in 1999, the station will begin a year-long series examining democracy
in Nepal, a project sponsored by the Westminster Foundation for Democracy,
as well as a soap opera designed to promote awareness of savings and credit
programmes, sponsored by the Centre for Micro Finance/CECI Nepal-Canada.
Finally, momentum is gathering to extend community radio to rural areas. In
mid-1998, the Madan Pokhara Village Development Committee in Western Nepal
was granted the second license for a community station. With the support of
Worldview, a network of fifteen NGOs was formed in November 1998 to develop
local community communications, specifically community radio. As more and
more local communities become informed and aware of community radio's
applications and possibilities, more and more are applying to the
government for a license to broadcast. Within five years it is conceivable
that Nepal will have a network of local stations in as many as a dozen
communities throughout the country.
Momentum is also gathering in the region overall. An Asian chapter of the
World Association of Community Radio Broadcasters (AMARC) was initiated in
August 1998 with offices in India and the Philippines. The Indian
Parliament is expected to introduce legislation allowing for community
radio in the first few months of 1999.
Radio Sagarmatha's main challenge at the moment is to develop the station's
capacity, especially in the area of production. With only one studio and
ever-increasing demand, facilities must be upgraded soon. Likewise human
resources must be enlarged and new training programmes introduced. Other
priorities include planning, networking and building partnerships with
local, regional and international groups, both to support the growth of
Radio Sagarmatha and the station's ability to support in turn other new
broadcasters..
As you can see, community radio is a growing concern in this part of the
world. I hope the update was interesting and please don't hesitate to call
if you would like to discuss any aspect of Radio Sagarmatha current
activities.
For Radio Sagarmatha,
Ian Pringle
International Cooperant (CECI)
ps. please let us know if you're not interested in news from radio sagarmatha.
ian pringle
radio sagarmatha: gpo box 6958 - kathmandu, nepal; wk: (977-1) 528 091
fax: 530 227; hm: 422 139 mail: c/o ceci; gpo box 2959 - kathmandu,
nepal; email: <ipringle@mos.com.np> <ipringle@vcn.bc.ca>
radio sagarmatha (lic. 1997) is south asia's first independent
community-based broadcaster representing a himalayan opportunity for public
interest communications and development in the subcontinent. the initiative
is sponsored in part by ceci, the canadian centre for international studies
and cooperation. if you would like a one page summary of the station's
mandate and activities or other information about radio sagarmatha return
email.
ceci, the centre for international studies and cooperation is a canadian
ngo with a country office in nepal. through the volunteer cooperation
program, ceci brings canadians to work with local groups like radio
sagarmatha for several years.
******************************************************************
From: "Eknath Belbase" <eknath@ad-co.com>
To: <nepal@cs.niu.edu>
Subject: RE: IRAQ PROTEST
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 1998 15:08:59 -0500
This is the text of a pamphlet passed out at a rally organized at Union
Square in
downtown Manhattan this last Sunday protesting the bombings in IRAQ.
About 1000 people attended. Contact:
39 W. 14th St., #206, New York, NY 10011
www.iacenter.org - e-mail: iacenter@iacenter.org
WHY WE ARE PROTESTING:
• Even if Iraq was in noncompliance, the U.S. action would be a major
violation of the UN Charter, international law, and U.S. law. The UN Charter
prohibits countries from carrying out military action against other
countries unless faced with the need for self-defense from imminent
aggression.
• The U.S. based its attack on the report by Richard Butler, chairman of
UNSCOM. But IUNSCOM is answerable only to the UN Security Council and the
Security Council did not authorize a U.S. bombing of Iraq. In fact, both
Russia and Chin-two of the five members of the Security Council-have
demanded that Butler be fired for having withdrawn UN weapons inspectors
without first receiving the support of the Security Council. The unilateral
decision to withdraw the weapons inspectors was clearly a U.S., not a UN,
operation. The Dec.16 Washington Post suggested that the administration had
carefully orchestrated the timing and content of Richard Butler's
unfavorable report about Iraq. The Dec. 18 New York Times said that the U.S.
air strikes had been planned since Dec. 1 and that Butler's report was
simply a "formality."
• So far, the U.S. bombing has hit local residential neighborhoods in
Baghdad, Basra and many other places in Iraq. By conservative estimates,
scores of civilians have been killed. A Russian diplomat has been killed.
Major water pipes providing water in residential areas in Baghdad have been
destroyed. A major civilian housing unit received a direct hit from a cruise
missile on Dec. 17. There is no way to know yet the extent of the damage,
but it is certain to be vast.
• The whole world knows that the military campaign is coupled with economic
sanctions and a major CIA subversion effort (most recently a$97 million plan
approved by Congress and Clinton) that constitute the core elements of a
classic destabilization strategy. The U.S. did this in Iran in 1953,
Guatemala in 1954, Chile under Allende from 1970-73, in Nicaragua against
the Sandinistas in the 1980s, and elsewhere. The real goal is to replace the
current government with a puppet government in a country that contains 10
percent of the world's known oil reserves.
But let's look at the specifics of the U.S. charges against Iraq right now.
They too are a lie. Was Iraq in noncompliance? Neither Butler nor the U.S.
has challenged the Iraqi Foreign Minister's statement that since November
17,1998, when Iraq allowed weapons inspections to resume, there have been
427 inspections, 128 of them at new sites, and UNSCOM has cited only five
so-called obstructions. Five obstructions! And what were they? 1) 45-minute
delay before allowing access. 2) a rebuff to an outrageous demand that
inspectors be allowed to interview all of the undergraduates in Baghdad
University's Science Department. 3) the inspection of a small headquarters
of the Baathist political party. Inspectors left those premises after they
were asked to explain the relationship between the small headquarters of a
party and the disarmament mission. 4&5) UNSCOM asked to inspect two
establishments on a Friday - the Muslim holy day. The Iraqis told UNSCOM
that since these establishments were not open on Friday, the inspectors
could visit the establishments, but they would need to be accompanied by
Iraqi officials. This is in accordance with the agreement between Iraq and
UNSCOM about Friday inspections. These five incidents are the supposed legal
basis for raining thousands of powerful missiles into Iraq.
• It is the U.S. government that is the largest producer of weapons of mass
destruction in the world. Only one country has ever dropped a nuclear
bomb--the U.S. did it twice on civilian areas in Japan in 1945. The U.S. has
more than 10,000 nuclear warheads. It has the largest stockpile of chemical
and biological weapons. The B-52 bombers are currently dropping
3-5,000-pound bombs from 30,000 feet in Iraq.
The death toll from this current round of criminal U.S. bombing is
rising-but the biggest killer is still the U.S.-imposed sanctions. In the
past eight years, over 1.6 million Iraqis have died as a direct result of
the sanctions, as reported by the UN's own agencies (UNICEF, WFP, FAO, and
others). Over one-third of the population is malnourished; 8,000 die each
month.
**********************************************************
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 1998 01:11:06 -0500 (EST)
Forwarded by: Ashutosh Tiwari <tiwari@fas.harvard.edu>
To: nepal@cs.niu.edu
Post-Publication Activity: Book Reviews
by Pratyoush Onta
A conference on the book publishing industry in Nepal was organized by the
National Booksellers and Publishers' Association of Nepal (NBPAN) in early
December 1998 in Kathmandu. More than 100 publishers, printers,
booksellers, librarians, and authors participated. The number of
participants and their full presence on both days surpassed the expectation
of the organizers.
Various speakers spoke informatively about different
aspects of the publishing industry in Nepal. At the end, the participants
passed two sets of resolutions. The first set urged the government to carry
out various actions to facilitate the development of the publishing
industry in Nepal. These included the establishment of an autonomous
National Book Development Council, the abolition of existing import duties
and other taxes levied on paper and other raw materials, and making
available discounted loans to the industry.
The second set of resolutions
was directed toward NBPAN. These included the establishment of a National
Book Publishing Trust to, "recognise and award writers, editors and
translators and encourage the reading habit in the general public." In
addition, NBPAN was urged to establish a trade school where skills related
to the publishing industry (pre-press, press and post-press) could be
imparted, organize regular book fairs, hold regular fora to facilitate the
exchange of relevant information and views, publish low-priced editions,
and contribute toward the establishment of libraries around the country.
At the end of the conference, many felt that a good amount of
discussion had taken place and NBPAN had been given enough suggestions to
keep itself busy in 1999 and beyond. One can only hope that NBPAN and its
office bearers will not only work toward the execution of the resolutions
but also start a vigorous democratic discussion amongst its members
regarding other problems of the industry. Enough hints about the problems
suffered by small-time publishers and booksellers were given during the
conference and one can only hope that NBPAN office-bearers will not behave
like the proverbial ostrich with its head under the ground!
Here, however, I want to just emphasize one small-time initiative
that can directly aid the publishing industry in Nepal. This deals with the
world of book reviews. Reviews are, of course, a post-publication activity.
They constitute one of the most recognized ways of
information-dissemination about books. When placed in mass media, they
perform a public service by bringing to the readers (or listeners' or
viewers') attention the book under review and also commentary on it by one
reviewer. Before focusing on the review as a genre, we must acknowledge
that information about books in the Nepali mass media has undoubtedly
increased in the last decade. The growing print media has discovered that
books too make news. We have, in recent times, read many news reports about
the launching of various books.
These ceremonies come in many different
forms: books by prominent authors launched by people in high offices, books
by otherwise obscure writers launched by prominent literary or political
heavyweights, and books published by prominent literary or other public
institutions. Reportage on books too has increased in part due to
collaboration between publishers and reporters. The increasing number of
columns written by literary types has meant that books have been the
subject of discussion in the feature sections of the print media as well.
This is particularly true for the case of weekly viewspapers.
Space for book reviews in various types of print media has also
increased. For the case of broadsheet dailies, the Review of Books
published two times a month in this paper, is a prominent example of what
is being done in the English-language press. Started by a small coalition
of book lovers in April 1996, the Review has seen more than 180 write-ups
by about 62 male and 23 female writers. Now produced by Martin Chautari for
this paper, the Review must be noted both for its continuity and variety.
With the aid of email, its coordinators have been able to tap, however
partially, Nepali and non-Nepali reviewers located outside of Nepal. The
Review's eventual presence in electronic bulletin boards such as
social.Culture.Nepal and electronic magazines such as The Nepal Digest as
well as its location in a home-page in the internet gives the books
reviewed a presence in the world not directly served by the hard copy of
this paper.
Among the Nepali language dailies, all the big four available in
the market do not have a separate section for book reviews. They do publish
an occasional review or two but their inability to give book reviews a
permanent place in their feature section is a reflection of how little
commitment they have thus far made to inculcating a culture of book reading
in Nepal. While others have made finances an excuse for this inability, it
is a shame that the most financially successful print media in Nepal,
Kantipur, can not devote a page to book reviews once or twice a month.
Among the Nepali magazines, the book review section found in the literary
monthly Madhuparka is the most extensive. One or two reviews are also
found regularly in other magazines.
Those who are concerned about the social lives of books in Nepal
and about the publishing industry in general ought to challenge the
publishers and editors to give more space for reviews and discussions about
books in their media. For the case of print, editorial acknowledgement of
this lacuna needs to go beyond lip-service. For the case of radio and TV,
new programs (as virtually none exist) that focus on books need to be
produced.
Writers, critics and academics must not only demand that reviews
be given more space and focus in mass media productions, but also show a
commitment to producing such reviews. The art of reviewing itself should
also become a subject of discussion here. All in all, books need to be made
viable in Nepal, well-beyond the hardware issues related to technology, raw
materials and the like.
****************************************************************
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 1998 13:09:46 -0500 (EST)
To: NEPAL@cs.niu.edu
From: Vincanne Adams <vadams@Princeton.EDU>
Subject: review response
Dear Editor,
I am sending a response to a review of my book Doctors For Democracy that
appeared recently in the Nepal Digest. I was wondering if you would be able
to post it for me? I do so in the spirit of furthering the sort of open
discussions that this electronic mail and news information service fosters.
Please inform me of your receipt and decision.
Thank you very much.
Vincanne Adams
Princeton University
RESPONSE:
After reading Dr. Saroj Dhital's review of my book, Doctors For Democracy:
Health Professionals in the Nepal Revolution, I thought it might be useful
to offer a few comments about my intentions in the book. My motivation here
is not to contest his critique. Those who read the book can assess the
basis for his claims and decide for themselves whether he has accurately
represented my views. I also resist the urge to incite and further
intellectual hostilities at a time when nearly every position adopted by
Nepali and/or foreigner working in Nepal is interpreted as self-aggrandizing
political profiteering. Here I would rather restate some issues I hoped
would be raised by the book with the goal of furthering productive
discussions about the meanings and forms of democracy there.
I wrote Doctors for Democracy (a title my publisher insisted on) in order to
raise questions and place issues on the map for discussion, not just for
Nepalis but many others who are questioning the nature, forms, and
possibilities for democracy in the late 20th century. The effort was not
prescriptive but descriptive. It seemed to me that Nepali health
professionals in particular offered useful insights here, especially
concerning the links between scientific notions and practices of modernity
being brought about by development, international capitalism, and new
political strivings. I suggest in the book that we might read some of these
practices s distinctly Western in origin, despite their appearance as
acultural, universal possibilities for governance and for establishing
truth. I wanted to explore the relationship between these practical demands
and what might be called local forms of knowledge and practice which are
shaping, informing and producing these processes as well. I knew, and noted
in the book, that selecting the health professionals from among the many
intellectuals who participated in this movement was risky, but, I thought,
worth the risk, provided I made clear that they were only a few, among many,
who played critical roles in the revolution.
The clear manner in which producing a revolutionary discourse was
articulated by doctors, nurses, paramedicals was, for me insightful because
they were deeply involved in life and death matters that were both political
and medically factual at the same time. It was also clear that while there
were many different motivations underlying these professionals' involvement
(described as four distinct orientations in chapter four), one could still
see a decisive rhetoric that was organized and put in place by some of the
more vocal of these participants, and it was this one that took hold enough
to force nearly everyone to "dance to its tune" regardless of their initial
motivations. By this I mean, there seemed to be at some point during the
movement a decisive rhetoric that helped articulate everyone's motivation
and perhaps even mandated the sort of participation that was allowed as
legitimate. This rhetoric positioned corruption and lies opposite
impartiality and truth in the same way that the monarchy was placed opposite
ideals of a multiparty democracy.
This rhetoric was, however, fraught with ambiguities. I expected this
insight to generate some productive engagement because it was already
contested among health professionals. Moreover, I anticipated that many
doctors and other health professionals would be disturbed by my suggestion
that scientific truths are themselves socially-contingent and not without
political bases. Nevertheless, what caught my eye was that it seemed as if
the medical professionals were able to convey the idea that medicine is both
by nature above politics, because it is scientific, but also deeply
obligated to politicization, since politics are at the root of much
ill-health. The idea that one reading of my accounts is that they simply
aimed to "justify the political actions of medical professionals"
instantiates my point. Here it is not entirely clear whether this point is
that such behaviors simply cannot be justified (because they corrupt medical
fairness) OR that such behaviors simply don't need justification (it is so
obvious that all health professionals must attend to the political causes of
ill-health). I found the nature of this alliance between medicine and
politics was incredibly fraught with contested meanings in precisely this
way. I don't think it is just medical professionals who are caught in this
ambiguity. But the medical field makes it more obvious in a way. Readers
unsympathetic to the ways that scholars contest scientific universalisms and
acultural objectivism will be confounded and perhaps irritated by this reading.
>
I tried to explore this ambiguity in terms of the possibility of social
critiques of science, which note that objectivist stances are themselves
culturally constituted, much as is the ideal type of "individualism" one
finds in many societies. My position was not that individualism was good,
or bad, but that one might characterize modernity as demanding some forms of
it that are new. I thought that to understand modernity in Nepal, however,
one would also have to explain the process whereby modernity has asked many
Nepalis, and many others in the world, to internalize development aid
critiques of patrimonialism, and traditional culture in general, including
various forms of reciprocity, family-based, and caste-based favoritisms. I
was not arguing in the book that parimonialism is an obstacle to
development. If anything, I was critiquing this development rhetoric. I
was arguing that the critical view offered in development rhetoric has been
internalized by many Nepalis in order to expain their failure to "develop"
(the view is exemplified in Bista's book). This, I argued, might be thought
of as one of the logics of modernity found in Nepal today and my point was
that it is hotly debated. Its contested nature may even help explain some of
the ambiguity felt among many professionals therein over how to be both
modern and democratic by participating in political processes while at the
same time maintaining allegiance to family values, caste-based political
processes, and new valorizations of ethnicity. It seemed as if on the one
hand being political was the fruit of the revolutionary labors, and at the
same time the accusation that someone was engaging in "politics" had become
a new form of public slander. The insight about these ambiguities is not
new, and can be found in many writings critical of colonialism such as that
of Ashis Nandy and others.
What I found was that the idea that traditional cultural practices are
corrupt, I noted, was articulated around the possibility of its opposite.
That is, ideas about corruption became set against ideals of impartial,
objectivist, meritocratic bases for decision-making. It seemed that medical
professionals were particularly able to articulate this sort of opposition
partly because of the nature of their own relationship to medical and
scientific truths. Again, I noted then and still note that they are not the
only ones doing this in Nepal, just the ones I have worked with. As an
anthropologist, my appraoch was to listen to the way that medical
professionals with a wide variety of interests were themselves framing the
debate.
I noted that both patrimonialism and a wide variety of demands calling for
"collectivist" social action (favoritism, nepotism, caste and family-based
prioritizing) present another face of the problem of ambiguity among Nepalis
from all walks of life. Sometimes fulfilling demands toward family and
caste, ethnic group or even village leaders is seen as a good thing, even
tied to ideas of what it means to be patriotic, and sometimes it is seen as
a form of corruption. Again, the latter view is, I believe, drawn partly
from an (admittedly non-uniform) Nepali adherence to ideas about
meritocracy, objectivism, impartiality that are found, among other places,
in the biomedical professions. I argued that it is far too simplistic to
attach the former to something called generically "traditional Nepali
culture"; clearly, the new democracy tends toward ethnic and caste-based
political processes that are generating demands for these collectivisms in
an entirely new way. But the ambiguity about what is good and bad in
collectivist, reciprocity-based, social networking is there. I would
suggest that it may be inherent to democracy not only in Nepal but wherever
it is strived for.
***********************************************************************************************
***********************************************************************************************
Date: Sun, 20 Dec 1998 01:03:29 -0500 (EST)
From: Ashutosh Tiwari <tiwari@fas.harvard.edu>
To: nepal@cs.niu.edu
Subject: Book Review IV
Source: The Kathmandu Post, 13 Dec 1998
Recent Arrivals
* DON'T DO AS I DO! (Sunbird Publishing House, 1998) by Joy Stephens is a
bilingual (English/Nepali) story book for children. The story is about
Bahadur the Bull who strolls on the streets of Kathmandu. Bahadur takes
the young readers with him for his adventures on the streets and teaches
them different road safety rules. The story is told in a very comical way
and the illustrations in the book make it an absorbing read. Bhunti the
Tiger is another story for the young readers which emphasizes the
importance of Tiger conservation. It is well-illustrated and easy to
follow. Similarly tow other books for pre-school kids are WHO HAS EATEN THE
MAIZE? and Jundle Cat. Both these books are exciting readings. All four
books are put out by Sunbird Publishing House.
* INSIDE NEPAL(Nabeen Publications, 1998) by Prakash A. Raj, a well known
Nepali travel writer, is an attempt to assess the major political,
economic, and social issues in Nepal at the end of the millennium. Raj has
rightly taken up corruption, the Maoist insurgency, janajati movement,
etc. as important themes but he fails to provide an adequate treatment of
them. He relies too much on secondary sources and seems to have written
this book in a hurry. In one of the appendices, the author lists the names
of several Nepalis under the heading "Who's Who in Nepal (beginning of new
millennium)." The criterion for inclusion is not spelled out and
information provided on a few of those listed is incorrect.
* HUMAN FEATURES (Shree Parmanand Kharel, 1998) By Mohan Kharel attempts
to analyse and synthesize human biological, psychological, philosophical
and social aspects. However, the author uses the conventional methods and
relies heavily on secondary information. The book is easy to read but has
plenty of spelling/grammatical mistakes. It is targeted to those readers
who are concerned about the unique psychological and philosophical outlook
of humans and the way it influences our mode of thought and action. Kharel
discusses various controversial issues like evolution and the origin of
mankind, god, and the biological influence on human behavior but is unable
to create his own opinion about these themes.
* Landownership in Nepal by Mahesh C Regmi has been reprinted (Delhi,
Adroit Publishers, Rs 1110). Originally published in 1976 in the US by the
University of California Press, this book has been long out-of-print. As
one of Regmi's early contributions to the economic history of
post-unification Nepal, this volume is a solid study of "how individuals
and institutions acquire rights in agricultural lands in Nepal." After
discussing the evolution of these rights through the Shah and Rana eras of
Nepali history, Regmi also analyzes the land reform efforts of the 1950s
and the 1960s. Many students at TU for whom this book is prescribed reading
will be delighted to know that it is finally available although its price
might be out of their reach. At a time when Nepali publishers are excitedly
talking about the publishing industry in Nepal, it is to be regretted that
one of the most definitive books ever to be written by a Nepali scholar has
been reprinted by a nondescript Indian publisher!
Source: The Kathmandu Post Review of Books, 13 Dec 1998
Diplomacy and Economic Development
BOOK: Japanese Economy and Economic Diplomacy
by Bama Dev Sigdel
Publisher: Madhav Pd. Sigdel, 1997, NRs.250
___________________________
by Navin Subedi
The emergence of Japan as an industrial powerhouse in the post
world war era has fascinated many. Researchers/economists, all over the
world, have tried to analyze the attributes that have contributed to the
rise of modern Japan. The book "Japanese Economy and Economic Diplomacy" is
yet another study in this regard by a young Nepalese economist. The author
has tried to trace out the relationship between government policy and
phenomenal rise of Japan as a major trading and aid-giving nation.
The book is, mainly, divided into five chapters. The book begins
with the current overview of the Japanese economy and economic development,
government policies in Early Tokuguwa period (1603-1867) and Meiji period
(1868-1912). The meiji restoration of 1868 is the single biggest important
stage in the economic development in the history of Japan. During the
period, foundations for modern infrastructure- tax reform, nation wide post
and telegraph system, and an adoption of the stock organization, import of
foreign machinery and the technicians and government owned factories - were
laid. It also gives an insight onto how foreign policy instruments were
used in enhancing her international trade.
By the time she surrendered to allied forces, her economy was in
grinding halt. Merchant marine had vanished, major cities had been burned
to ground and economy had contracted. In the first two years of occupation,
she had to reel under heavy inflation coupled with wide spread hunger and
poverty. In the post world war era. Japanese economy grew at an impressive
rate.
The author has attributed to various factors viz, highly educated
labor force, changes in the organizational structure, wide spread use of
modern management, modern technology, high domestic saving rate and inflow
of foreign capital for this remarkable performance. Hit by the first oil
crisis of 1973, Japan, for the first time in the post world war era,
recorded negative GNP growth. Second oil crisis again rocked her economy
early 80s. The author has discussed various measures introduced to nullify
the effects of the first and second oil crisis. He also discusses the
present economic mess in Japan.
Nature, composition and direction of Japan's international trade
since Meiji restoration have also been discussed. He has also analyzed the
role played by trade during the same period and the issues of her huge
trade surplus with U.S.A and European Community.
The Japanese aid policy started as a reputation paid to south East
Asian nations in the 50s. Her aid policy is directed by geo-political
imperatives: to secure stable source of raw materials for her industries
following the loss of Asian colonies: to promote her exports; and to
augment trade deficit recorded by her economically weak trading partners.
The author has noted with delight that since late 80s she is globalising
her aid programs. Role of various institutions -JICA and Export Import Bank
of Japan- are widely discussed. Nature and trend of aid flow to SAARC
countries in general and Nepal in particular have been analyzed.
Chapter IV discusses the ways as to how each successive government
since the Meiji restoration has used foreign policy and diplomacy to
enhance her international trade. In the post world war era. Japan has given
utmost priority to regional economic groupings. Since they can provide
stable source of raw materials to her industries fund gives chance to
maintain and consolidate a pacific economic under her leadership.
The author ends up with the conclusion that Japan could overcome
present economic mess and predicts rosy future. In general, the book is
highly informative and interesting to the students, policy makers and
researchers alike. Though the book was first published in 1997, most of the
data presented are of late 1980s. It is hoped that the data will be updated
in the next edition.
(Subedi is a Pre-MBA student at Kathmandu University)
Nepali Muslim Peddlars
____________________________
BOOK: Ni brahmanes ni anc=E9tres. Colporteurs musulmans du N=E9pal.
[(Having) neither Brahmans nor Ancestors. Muslim Peddlers of Nepal]
by Marc Gaborieau
Nanterre: Soci=E9t=E9 d'ethnologie, 1993
______________________________________
Reviewed by Gregory G. Maskarinec
Walking through the middle hills of Western Nepal in 1964, Marc Gaborieau
experienced a moment of epiphany that transformed his scholarly career.
Requesting a mid-day meal in a village whose inhabitants appeared identical
to Hindus of the surrounding villages, he was told: "There's no question of
lunch. It's Ramadan!" This accidental stumbling across of Nepal's Muslim
banglemakers has resulted in an impressive flow of articles, an earlier
monograph, and now, this definitive work.
Curau=DDe, Muslim banglemakers, are descended from Hindu converts of Northe=
rn
India who began, at least as early as the seventeenth century, to settle in
the various hill kingdoms that now comprise Nepal. Given land by local
rulers in exchange for the glass ornaments that they manufactured, they
formed small but stable communities.=20
They have been considerably
assimilated. Their kinship terms, for example, show no traces of languages
their ancestors spoke, but are identical to those used throughout Nepal.
Although Nepalis derisively refer to Islam as "ul=DDo dharma," upside-down
religion, this emphasis on differences, Gaborieau persuasively argues, is
more the result of power struggles among elites than one of intrinsic
practices.=20
Islam in South Asia, he shows, preserves many fundamentally
Hindu practices of caste, kinship, life cycle ceremonies and calendrical
festivities. It is not just that a substratum of Hindu practices survived
conversion, however. Gaborieau demonstrates that a specific historical
configuration arose, which he calls "medieval North-Indian Islam." This
arrangement unself-consciously elaborated many Hindu themes by addition and
substitution. As a result, Muslims have been traditionally distinguished
from Hindus by only a minimum set of canonical practices, most
conspicuously, circumcision and burial of the dead.
Some key elements of medieval North-Indian Islam are the acceptance of the
miraculous interventionary power of saints and the collective impurity of
the patrilineage at the time of a death or a birth. Perhaps most notable is
the rite that ends the main mourning period after forty days, when a fakir,
a member by birth of a heterodox Sufi order, acts as funerary priest and
receives mortuary gifts from the chief mourner, who also honors him by
tying a turban around his head. Gaborieau's informants even reported that
within memory, symbolic food offerings (rice balls-pi=9E=8Fa, just as Hindu=
s
feed to their ancestors) were made periodically at the tombs.=20
In cases of a
death in inauspicious circumstances, the deceased may, as for Hindus,
trouble his lineage. Such cases require a spirit medium through whose mouth
the spirit speaks. The medium often establishes a shrine for the spirit,
where members of the lineage regularly worship. Lineage cults are common
throughout Nepal, but, since, as the Prophet himself stated, "there is no
genealogy in Islam," it is remarkable to find them among Muslims (these
practices are, not surprisingly, condemned by reformists as Satanic).
Such close similarities with Hindu structures stimulate Gaborieau to pursue
a wider inquiry into Curau=DDe kinship and social structure, the central
concerns of this work. Both topics are meticulously situated into their
widest political, legal, and religious dimensions, with both fine details
and general issues of power and domination examined. My one complaint is
that the text is frozen in an "ethnographic present" of 1964-1975, leaving
the reader to wonder whether the last twenty years haven't brought further
changes, whether, for example, untouchable Hindu musicians still play at
Muslim weddings or whether reformists have suppressed spirit mediums.
However, the startling and wide-ranging conclusions reached, and the
historical depth achieved by a careful reading of the available material,
make this a minor flaw in a profoundly compelling book.
The first half of the book consists of descriptive material: ethnographic
context, kinship terminology, legal constraints (permissible marriages have
been closely regulated by the Nepalese state since the legal code of 1853),
and religious constraints (elegantly examined in terms of life cycle
ceremonies). While much of this extensive material is genuinely
interesting, it is the book's second half, consisting of carefully argued
interpretations, that make this work so remarkable.=20
Gaborieau discovered
that while all other aspects of Curau=DDe kinship structure differ very
little from that of Hindus, after six or eight generations, patrilineages
break into intermarrying segments, a practice unthinkable among Hindus. The
results, he demonstrates, is in an intermediate system between the extremes
of endogamy and exogamy, a model that effectively undermines this most
archetypal dichotomy of structuralist kinship theory. Gaborieau shows that
this system is made possible because the Muslims refuse to sacralize
relationships of power.=20
If there is a radical opposition between Hinduism
and Islam, he argues, it is found neither in kinship nor social systems,
but in the relations of power to the sacred. Conversion to Islam
desacralized the lineage, permitting exogamy to fracture. Marriage became a
contract instead of a sacrifice, weakening relations among affines.
Conversion likewise weakened obligations that bind a patrilineage into a
corporate grouping by eliminating the ancestral deities that Hindu worship,
so that clans never evolved. Consequently, at the local level, power is
atomized, producing deteriorations both symbolic and substantial in the
relations of authority.
Gaborieau shows that Curau=DDe occupy a precise position in the caste
hierarchy as an impure but not untouchable group. He demonstrates that
South Asian Islam clearly recognizes the division of humanity into multiple
ranked groups on the basis of profession and birth, and that these groups
have different degrees of ritual purity. To put it simply, they practice a
caste system.=20
The free commensuality of Muslims is nothing but a myth,
particularly when it comes to untouchables. Contrary to a wide-spread
belief, conversion to Islam does not better one's status: Hindu
untouchables become Muslim untouchables. Curau=DDe refuse to accept food or
water from an untouchable's hand; they refuse them entry into their houses;
physical contact compels ritual purification before entering the mosque.
Explicitly refuting the claim that Hindus and Muslims form two separate
societies on the basis of their opposing "ultimate" values, Gaborieau
convincingly demonstrates that South Asian Islam might be called a Hinduism
without Brahmans or ancestors; the system is "decapitated," but not
obliterated.
This work refutes Islam's modernist claim to be a necessarily egalitarian
religion, as well as the assertion, as Ernest Gellner's memorable opening
sentence of Muslim Society (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981)
declared, that "Islam in the blueprint of a social order."=20
Before
Gaborieau's work, the questions of whether South Asian Muslims maintain a
caste system and have a distinct social structure had been answered both
ways, depending on whether members' assertions or observed social relations
were emphasized. This book conclusively demonstrates that South Asian
Muslims knowingly practice both a caste system and a social order very
similar to those of Hindus, and that, at least for South Asia, hierarchy as
much as egalitarian beliefs characterize Islam.
(Reviewer Maskarinec's second book Nepalese Shaman Oral Texts has just
been published by Harvard University Press. Reprinted from Anthropos 91
(1996).
*******************************************************************
Date: Sat, 19 Dec 1998 20:39:51 -0800 (PST)
From: Aiko Joshi <kaguyahime8@yahoo.com>
Subject: Suggestions wanted
To: Nepal Digest <NEPAL@cs.niu.edu>
I hope someone on TND will be able to help me out:
(Perhaps Nepalis in the UK?)
I am interested in getting suggestions on what schools in India and
England have good doctoral programs in Gender and Developlment? I'm
hoping to begin a Ph.D in that area in year 2000. I'm currently
finishing up my Master's thesis and am scheduled to graduate in May,
1999. Would TU in Nepal have a Gender and Development program as
well?
I would certainly appreciate any suggestions!! Thanks!
Aiko Joshi
kaguyahime8@yahoo.com
While this forum is concerned with Nepal and Nepal-related things, I know
that there are many subscribers who are not Nepali, and there may be
those from Iraq or of Iraqi ancestry or have Iraqi friends. It is to
them that I would like to take a moment to offer my thoughts and prayers
as the imperialistic forces of the United States reins destruction on the
city of Bhagdad. I think of the ordinary citizens of Iraq who have
suffered enough through US-led sanctions; there is no justification. If
the US is so concerned with Iraq being in possession of nuclear weapons
and other weapons of "mass destruction"(the MOST favorite term of the
imperialists), then let the US -- who has the LARGEST arsenal of ANY
country in the entire world -- take the first step and disarm itself!(In
your dreams, bub!) As the puppets of the Clinton regime pontificate on
how "they" cannot "allow" Hussein his weapons (or India or Pakistan or
any other country NOT from the Western Hemisphere), let's ponder the
hypocrisy of their yammerings, and let's think about the people of Iraq
shivering in fear and uncertainty, and those who have been burned and
wounded, lying in hospital right now. My heart goes out to Iraqi
brothers and sisters, and I hope that the terroristic acts being
perpetrated on them will cease soon so that they may observe Ramadan in
peace.
In Solidarity,
Aiko Joshi
************************************************************
Date: Sun, 20 Dec 1998 16:51:49 +0100
To: NEPAL@cs.niu.edu
Subject: kein Betreff
From: namita.kiranthuene@t-online.de (Namitakthuene)
Around Annapurna
I did not make it to Thorung La Pass. I am spared from the honour of climbing
the highest pass in the world, 5,416 m (17,700 ft). We had to return from
Letdar (4,176 m or 13,700 ft). My husband got altitude sickness. Men! I am
not joking : All the six people I saw in my three week trek who returned with
this sickness were men! Has somebody done any research on that? Since I did
not go over the pass and made a complete loop I should have titled this as
'around Annapurna that I fail to make.' As a matter of fact I didn't even want
to talk about my trek up from Besi Shahar to Letdar and back to Besi Shahar. Of
course, the mountains were spectacular, people were friendly and villages were
dirty! These go without saying. What I want to talk about is Kathmandu where I
spent some of my time. My once beautiful Kathmandu, where have you gone?
This October My husband and I went to Nepal to do some trekking and visiting my
relatives. Does anybody know this year is "visit Nepal year?" You could tell
by the logo you see every corner of Nepal from Kathmandu's New Road Gate to the
gate of a gompa in Manang. What the officials of Kathmandu hoped is to bring
some more tourists into Nepal. I heard they succeeded in increasing the numbers
but alas! There is a difference between quality and quantity, isn't there?
The more you don't talk about Kathmandu the better it is. But still I am
compelled to. My sincere apologies to Kathmanduites.
When I walked around Thamel and other tourist "heaven" or "ghetto" whichever you
prefer, there were so few tourists you wondered if it is really October or if
Nepal is really celebrating 'visit Nepal year.' The reason for this unsightings
of tourist? Of course, the pollution! Who would want to stay in a city where
you have to walk like a bandit covering your eyes, mouth and nose and when you
come home either you have to call a doctor or start gargling with germicide
liquid? I spent four weeks in Kathmandu and I got respiratory infection,
bronchitis - you name it - and don't even mention about the sore throat. And,
don't forget the noise and the total anarchy in the street (that Hutch mentions
rightfully),and the heap of garbage. Also I noticed a peculiar mind set of
Nepalese people especially in shops. Could it have stemmed from the total
corrupt government or is it something else? Outside in the street or at home
ordinary citizen are just tired of the so called "democracy." There was even a
huge rally with the slogan "bring the king back and save Nepal." Unfortunately
when they reached Tundikhel and as soon as they started to give speech they were
pelted by the members of "democratic front" and had to leave the stage -
bloodied. The restlessness, the hopelessness (one just has to read the daily
newspaper to know the scandal about Chase air and the price of onions) among
Nepali citizen is so widespread you don't want to believe these were the same
people who demonstrated and dodged bullets in the streets to bring these people
in power and to empower themselves.
Just before I started talking about the helplessness of people I was talking
about the peculiar mindset of shop keepers. As a matter of fact this mindset
doesn't limit to shop keepers. Then there are taxi drivers, pedestrians,
industrialist etc. When I walked around with my husband and talked in English I
was somebody special who is going to spend thousands of dollars on their goods.
Ok if not thousand then hundreds. But, as soon as I changed my outfits wore
kurta salwar and walked with my Sari-wearing mother, the same people would not
even look at us. We had to wait and wait in shops until they would feel pity at
us and grant their question "what do you want?" Just one incident among many:
I went to a bookstore in Thamel to buy few books. I went around the store and
looked for the books. In the mean time I had noticed when a White guy entered
one of the staff had asked how he could help. So I went to the same staff and
asked if they have this particular book and I told him the title. Now, he looks
at me and asks how many do I want?? I thought what a stupid question and asked
him "how many books does one can read of the same title?" Then he tells me the
price without my asking. At this time I had to tell him that I was asking if
he has the book not how much the book costs. At that time I just marveled at
the stupidity of that staff then it dawned on me it was not a matter of
stupidity but a subtle racism. Since I am a Nepali I may not know English and
even I am capable of reading I cannot have the money! Even by chance I happen
to have money then I want to buy so that I will sell later. It changes quickly
as I have mentioned before, when I wear western outfit and speak in English. A
Nepali being marginalised in Nepal! Do you want to take a comfortable bus to
Pokhara, no you cannot. Comfortable buses are only for tourists, even when you
are willing to pay their price. Forget about "comfortable bus." Do you want to
eat potato and onion with your rice? No you cannot. Because the price has gone
up so high ordinary citizen cannot afford to buy (what are the politicians
doing?)! Do you want to have a dress made? You don't get it on time. Why?
Because the tourists clothes took precedence. And on and on. When is this
corruptness of mind going to change? The physical beauty of Kathmandu is
tarnished as one could easily see it but why does it have to be thinking also?
>From the politicians to the ordinary citizen of Nepal they are suffering from
this ailment. Open any newspaper and the first thing one sees is how much money
was swindled by which minister or which MP. Look at the crime statistics of
Kathmandu valley. It is mind boggling. Is this degeneration going to continue
or somehow people will realize, sort of enlightenment, and find a new path for
the betterment of society. Mentioning all these things I am not saying there
are some people (there are always, aren't they?) who are trying very hard to
turn this negative tide to a positive one. But, for how long are these few and
far between messiah going to stop this massive negative onslaught?
I intend to go to Nepal every other year and I will be recording the progress
either direction; north or south. Maybe the next time I will complete the
circle around Annapurna and will write about the Himalayas, the trails, the
rivers and maybe about the people, if they are nice enough.
Namita Kiran-Thuene
Duessoldorf, Germany
******************************************************************
From: "Paramendra Bhagat" <paramendra@hotmail.com>
To: nepal@cs.niu.edu
Subject: Responses to Khati,Mishra,Tiwari,Singh,Thapa...
Date: Sun, 20 Dec 1998 18:23:09 PST
Responding to Diwas Khati, Pramod K. Mishra, Rabindra Mishra, Ashutosh
Tiwari, Bipulendu Narayan Singh, Hari Thapa, and Dal Bhat.
My response in brackets.()
(Diwas Khati <mailto:diwask@hotmail.com> 16 Dec 1998
Copyright violations by Paramendra Bhagat...
(Mr. Khati, every time I have sent something that has not been my
original writing, but has made the points I have been trying to make on
this forum, I have sent the web address of my source along with the
posting. In some of my recent postings, the Editor seems to have chosen
to delete the web addresses. I request the Editor to please not do that.
I think it helps that you can clink on the link provided and jump to the
original source from the archives. There have been no attempts on my
part to violate copyright.)
Pramod K. Mishra <mailto:pkm@acpub.duke.edu> 8 Nov 1998
Hindu Kingdom under Siege!...I was troubled by Hari Bansh Jha and N.N.
Thakur's essay of Nov. 4 in TND about Nepal, a Hindu Kingdom, under
seize.
(I applaud Mr. Mishra's decision to take a stand on this sensitive
issue. When I talk against the racism - for me the term racism is a term
in sociology, not biology - directed against the Teraiwasis in Nepal, I
do so with the knowledge roughly half the country are Teraiwasis;
someday the tide will turn and the Teraiwasis will take their right
share in the country's governance through the ballot box. But the
non-Hindus are only 20% of the population. How are alarmists like Jha
and Thakur different from those white supremacist fanatics who talk
about "taking America back for the Americans?" A country that will call
itself Hindu in its constitution just because 80% of its peoples are
followers of that faith is also the second poorest country on the
planet. That is no coincidence. A successful economy requires that the
participants become more open-minded and accepting of differences. It is
important to discuss racism, sexism, casteism, and Hindu
supremacism...all of these debates are of direct relevance to the
national economy and the abject poverty that the likes of the Maoists
who point out all the right problems but offer all the wrong solutions
feed on. Open up, people.)
Rabindra Mishra <mailto:Rabindra@btinternet.com> 6 Nov 1998
Nepali Congress:Is It On A Self-Destructive Path?
(Yes, the Nepali Congress is on its way down and out. "Where there is no
vision," a political party shall perish. Although the chief architect of
the political revolution that ushered in democracy into the country, the
Congress has lost steam. It has refused to realize the country needs to
focus on the national economy "with the intensity of a laser beam." How
will the Congress fight corruption that it sponsors through the likes of
the AKGB and the basic Laloism of Koirala? Koirala lacks vision. New
generation leaders like Deuba, although better suited on questions of
the national economy, lack the guts to push Koirala aside, sideline the
AKGB, take over the party, redefine its basic vision, incorporate the
left's emphasis on the abject poverty of half the population, the just
demands of the Sadbhavana party as regards the plight of the Teraiwasis,
and basically rejuvenate the party. The Congress might be big today, but
then so was the Panchayat regime.)
Diwas Khati <mailto:diwask@hotmail.com> 7 Nov 1998
To Paramendra with Love
(Not that there is anything wrong with being gay - courtesy: Seinfeld -
but I happen to be straight. Send your love to a more appropriate
address and you might not be disappointed.)
Looking at the size of your postings, and the amount of hard work you
have to put into its compilation and processing, I think it is time for
you to start your own "Paramendra Post"
(Search for "paramendra" on AltaVista. You will be surprised you have
found your solution. Goto Chaitime.com and The Berea Inquirer. And a
bunch of other places. As for your sideshow, you just come across to me
as one of those Pahadwasi supremacists who is unhappy I am bringing up
topics they would not like to be brought up for the next "500 years.")
On another note, don't you think you are simply posting irrelevant
stuffs there?
(I have posted absolutely nothing that is not of relevance to Nepal. Be
specific in your comments and I will be able to help you out in a
greater detail.)
.. thought do my part to "jaatibaad" abolishion in Paramendra_Land...
(Afno ang ko bhainsi na dekhne...what's up with you people...)
Hari Thapa <mailto:thapahari@hotmail.com> 14 Nov 1998
Like many other readers I have been wondering why you are still allowing
Mr. Bhagat to publish his articles.
(Although the Teraiwasis are half the population, they are less than 20%
of the national parliament, less than 10% of the state bureaucracy, less
than 5% of the police force, and virtually non-existent in the army.
Look at the names of any of the Nepalese organizations in the US; the
Executive Committees are all peopled by you NSHCWAHM people: Nepali
Speaking High Caste Wealthy Aged Hindu Males. And here is one forum
where one Teraiwasi is speaking his mind just like all other
contributors, 95% of whom are NSHCWHM, and I am not surprised you cannot
live with that. I am glad you are speaking your mind. If you cannot live
with the freedom of expression with all your American "upbringing," all
that expensive degrees you might have accumulated in the "land of
opportunity," the readers will wonder how your kith and kin treat the
Teraiwasis back in Nepal. Do you get the picture? Thanks for helping me
paint the portrait of the ground realities in Nepal for the Teraiwasis.
Firstly, the Teraiwasis are as Nepalese as you NSHCHM folks - you look
like the Indians in Darjeeling, we like those in UP and Bihar - but even
if you were to describe the Teraiwasis as Indian-origin, in that the
royal family is Rajasthani-Nepali, I guess the fact that China is an
emerging superpower does not seem to help out the ethnic Chinese in
Indonesia, does it? It is not long before the umbilical cord that ties
the NSHCHM elite in the Congress to the Delhi elite is cut and the
prominent Teraiwasi politicians stop apologizing for "looking Indian"
and themselves establish strong bonds with the Delhi elite instead.)
I am NOT interested in reading unedited 'cut and paste' articles from
the internet. I am pretty sure most of your readers are not very
interested in politics, especially when it comes to Bihar and UP. Mr.
Bhagat's articles are extremely boring and lengthy. I am clueless as to
WHY anyone of us should be interested in reading his articles. They have
no substance and are out of context. There are other important issues
that need to be discussed. We can still wait for another five hundred
years to discuss about Racism, Sexism, Abortion, Homosexuality etc.
(You are referring to http://www.antiracist.com ...well, here is your
answer. You say Nepal can wait "500 years" before it talks racism. 500
years before it becomes an economy with the sophistication of the
Canadian economy? Well, I am transporting you to Canada right now
through cyberspace, and having you deal with the racist instincts in
you, right now. Why 500 years? Neither of us will be around that long.
Canada has the sophistication of a Canadian economy! Racism has not
withered away as a result. Diarrhoea and cancer are two different
diseases. The cures for the two are different. Don't ignore cancer.
Racism is that cancer. Be it in Nepal or elsewhere. Racism directed
against the Teraiwasis in Nepal is a problem NOW, not one that will
emerge in 500 years. So it has to be dealt with NOW. Besides, you don't
decide the timetable for the Teraiwasis. Hold your breath, wait a couple
election cycles.)
The most important issues that surrounds us now are not those social
evils but education, Healthcare, and elimination of poverty. We need to
bring into justice the people that robbed our nation in the past and the
present. I will be more than willing to share my views on OUR issues
than some hick not renting an apartment to an Indian in Winnepeg.
(On the contrary, I think Nepal is incapable of rapid economic growth,
as long as it refuses to acknowledge the Teraiwasis as "genuine"
Nepalese as the Pahadwasis. When I am bringing up racism, sexism,
casteism, and Hindu supremacism, I am talking The National Economy,
Stupid!)
Ashutosh Tiwari <mailto:tiwari@fas.harvard.edu> 5 Nov 1998
NYT on gurkhas (fwd)
(What about those Indians who sold Hotmail to Bill Gates for a few
hundred million dollars!)
Bipulendu Narayan Singh <mailto:singhb@wabash.edu> 16 Oct 1998
Now tell me who are the supremacists. The people who think
that only their religion has the right to exist, that only their form
worship or those who don't even believe in converting people
from other religions. Who is more Tolerant
(Yeah, there are those who profess to be Christians and are Christian
supremacists, and then there are those who profess to be Muslim and are
Muslim supremacists, those who kill in the name of God...but how does
their presence on this planet excuse your own Hindu supremacist feelings
which say it is okay to call Nepal a Hindu nation just because 80% of
its peoples are Hindu? What about those Nepalese who are Buddhists,
Muslims and Christians? Yes, it is okay for the Christian missionaries
to preach Christianity in Nepal, just like it is okay for those
Americans who might be born Christian to adopt Buddhism. That is what
has been promised by the country's constitution ushered in after the
re-installment of democracy. It is for the individual to decide what
faith they wish to adopt. Just because someone is born Hindu does not
mean they hereby give you the right to rob them of their inherent
freedom of religious faith...Yeah, it is okay for those Nepalese who
might have been born Hindu to convert and adopt Christianity, if that is
what they want for themselves...isn't it pathetic 80% of the Hindu
population should fear the Christian population in Nepal which stands at
less than 1% or that it should fear that one Masjid in Kathmandu....what
if it is close to the Royal Palace! I especially deplore those Brahmins
who are alarmed the so-called low-caste Hindus and the so-called
"tribals" and the "Adivasis" and the "untouchables" and the "hill
tribes" have especially warmed to the Christian missionaries. If I were
an "untouchable" give me one good reason why I would cling on to the
Hindu doctrine for another second. It would be like being black and
paying dues to the KKK in the American context. Why would anyone in
their right mind want to do that? What surprises me is as to why all
those deemed "untouchable" do not bid farewell to a religion that seems
to be incapable of ridding itself of its casteism do not abandom the
ship Ambedkar style? Ambedkar died a Buddhist.)
Hari Thapa <mailto:thapahari@hotmail.com> 19 Oct 1998
Dear Mr. Bhagat: I have been reading your articles on racism for quite a
while now.
(Scroll down...you go on to say noone in their right mind would do
that!)
You sound like a sick politician who is willing to do anything to get
into power.
(I am no politician. I am a college student, an undergrad at that. Am I
sick? No. The FBI tried to say Martin Luther King was "sick," not that I
am comparing myself to MLK, but I just thought would let you know those
who have dared to discuss racism as a topic have been called "sick" in
the past.)
You have no regards for 'Madhises' whatsoever. From your letter
it seems like all you want to do is exploit poor uneducated people by
playing ethnic(race) card. I am very much convinced of your ill motives
and am having hard time understanding why US educated person
like youself would have such a sick mind.
(I am the one having a hard time understanding why YOUR American
education does not help you see the plight of the Teraiwasis. What
prevents you from acknowledging the bias against the Teraiwasis in
Nepal's state structure?)
If there are any true enemies of Nepali people it's YOU and only you. We
have plenty of corrupt politicians who deserve nothing but death
penalty.
(Careful now...you sound awfully like Govinda Raj Joshi. Not that I am
implying Joshi was behind what happened to Mirza....There is no real
proof, but that is very much a possibility.)
I have seen a clear correlation between those politicians and future
politician like youself. Your analogy of Jews, Indonesian Chinese with
Nepali Madhises is nothing but an absurd propaganda.
(I think there is a clear analogy between the "Indian" Nepalese, as you
people like to label us, and the ethnic Chinese in Indonesia, and the
African-Americans in the US. Cancer is cancer is cancer. Racism is
racism is racism. Dr. Shah, a Teraiwasi who works for the IMF, said in a
speech at the Tribhuvan University in Kathmandu that it is worse for the
Teraiwasis in Nepal than it is for the blacks in the US.)
Most of all, this news magazine is not your party magazine and I
guarantee noone in the right state of mind is remotely interested in
reading what your 'Kuvawana party' has to offer. So STOP your nonsense
and get lost if you can.
(Not that you will succeed, but you are trying to deny me the rights
that every other contributor of this forum, over 95% of them NSHCHM like
yourself, have, and that is to freely express themselves. Your hatred
for the Teraiwasis is expressed in your hatred for the Sadbhavana.
Sorry, bad news for you, I am here to stay.)
Dal Bhat <mailto:dukku@hotmail.com> 19 Oct 1998
(Dear Dal Bhat, whatever your opinion, your presence might have been
more valid if you had disclosed your real identity.)
Whatever conclusions we may derive, and however many times we try to fit
nepali racism into western words, the fact remains that we are Nepalese
supposedly the owners of a rich culture, a fact every Nepali seems to
mention like Everest or Lumbhini. So to define racism in western terms
and tag it to Nepal makes as much sense to me as a "Holy cow" to an
western farmer.
(I consider myself a student of the political process like someone might
be a student of medical science. You are not alarmed a student of
Economics might bring up the topic of inflation, but you are alarmed a
student of politics brings up the topic of racism. You don't ask if a
doctor who might treat cancer has personal experiences of that disease,
but I have been repeatedly asked on this forum to prove I have personal
experiences - which I have in plenty ...what Nelson Mandela in his
autobiography calls "a thousand daily indignities" - of racism; meaning,
if I don't that proves racism does not exist! Most of the doctors in
Nepal have gotten western trainings, either in South Asia or the west,
or in Nepal itself. You don't tell them that because the training they
received was not on the native soil, they are "western farmers." Racism
is racism is racism. And it does not help for you to tell me both of us
are Aryans and thus members of the same race. To me racism is a term not
in biology but sociology.)
I am not saying that there is not a caste problem, but just stressing
that exploitation is a much bigger one..... exploitation occurs from the
mountain to the Terai, fueled perhaps by economic hardships, which I am
hoping some anthropologists are studying.
(In bringing up racism, I am not denying the existence of er problems
like sexism, casteism and Hindu supremacism, or poverty. I think poverty
IS the number one issue for the country to deal with. But you cannot say
I will ignore the rest and focus just on the poverty situation.)
Now with the slow but sure arrival of western-Baptist-Christianity into
our masses, we are guaranteed a piece of heaven (or a couple of hundred
dollars) for our newfound faith.
(This alarmist tone of the statement is but another expression of Hindu
supremacism.)
----------------------
Subject: NC, UML, NSP, RPP
The NC, UML and the NSP have come together to form a coalition cabinet
with four members each from the NC and the UML and one each from the NSP
and the RPP, should the RPP decide to join hands. The RPP has refused to
get inducted stating Koirala has not stated free and fair elections as
his prime concern.
It is heartening the proposed size of the cabinet is small. It is also
heartening the four nationally recognized parties might actually come
together to form a national government.
Just like the May 1990 movement saw the coming together of the otherwise
disparate forces who saw common ground in a call for a multi-party
framework, this might be a chance for the otherwise disparate political
forces in the country to lay down a firm commitment to free and fair
elections, both through appropriate legislation and through a firm
introduction of fair practices. Can we expect the introduction and
adoption of any legislation in near future whereby all political parties
would have to keep their accounts transparent, disclose all their
sources of funding as well their expenditures?
The political process so far has been hampered by a non-practice of free
and fair elections and a fundamental lack of anti-corruption legislation
which would ask all politicians and bureaucrats at all levels of the
state apparatus to disclose their wealth and income annually. If only
the major political parties in the country could cash on this new-found
common ground to also lay ground for such legislation, the political
process in the country could make a leap to a genuine exchange of ideas
primarily focused on the national economy.
The system needs greater transparency than it has been accorded so far
so as to deliver more to the Nepalese people. The country adopted
democracy in 1990. These new steps would be the next few steps in that
direction.
Democracy is as western a concept as the Theory of Relativity is Jewish.
The same would be true of free markets. Or of information technology.
-----------------------
I will take care to send along only the web addresses of the links that
I might find relevant to the point I might be wanting to make in my
future postings. Besides, those who visit the archives' site can always
point and click and visit those links should they so wish. Thanks for
pointing out.
******************************************************************************
* *
* The Nepal Digest(TND) is a publication of TND Foundation, a global *
* not-for-profit information and resource center committed to promoting *
* issues concerning Nepal. All members of tnd@nepal.org will get a copy of *
* The Nepal Digest (TND). Membership is free of charge and open to all. *
* *
* TND Foundation Home Page: http://www.nepal.org *
* http://www.himalaya.org *
* http://www.gurkhas.org *
* For Information: tnd@nepal.org *
* webmaster: tnd@nepal.org *
* *
* TND Foundation contributions (TAX-DEDUCTIBLE) can be mailed payable to: *
* TND Foundation *
* P.O. Box 8206 *
* White Plains, NY 10601 *
* USA *
* *
* Subscription/Deletion requests : mailto:TND@NEPAL.ORG *
* Provide one line message: sub nepal "lastname, firstname, mi" <user@host> *
* [OPTIONAL] Provide few lines about your occupation, address, phone for *
* TND database to: <TND@NEPAL.ORG> *
* *
* Postal-Mail Correspondences to: TND Foundation *
* P.O. Box 8206 *
* White Plains, NY 10602 *
* USA *
* *
* Digest Contributions: mailto:NEPAL@MP.CS.NIU.EDU *
* THE EDITOR RESERVES THE RIGHT TO EDIT ARTICLES FOR CLARITY. *
* Contributors need to supply Header for the article, email, and full name. *
* *
* Postings are divided into following categories that are listed in the *
* order below. Please provide category-type in the header of your e-mail. *
* *
* 1. Message from TND Editorial Staff *
* TND Foundation News/Message *
* 2. Letter to the Editor *
* Letter to TND Foundation *
* 3. TAJA_KHABAR: Current News *
* 4. KATHA_KABITA: Literature *
* 5. KURA_KANI: Economics *
* Agriculture/Forestry *
* Health *
* Education *
* Technology *
* Social/Cultural Issues *
* Environment/Population *
* Women/Children *
* Tourism *
* Foreign Policy *
* History *
* Military/Police *
* Politics *
* 6. CHOOT_KILA (Humor, Recipies, Movie Reviews, Sattaires etc.) *
* 7. JAN_KARI: Classifides (Matrimonials, Jobs etc) *
* 8. KHOJ_KHABAR (Inquiring about Nepal, Nepalis etc. ) *
* 9. TITAR_BITAR: Miscellaneous (Immigration and Taxex etc. ) *
* *
* COPYRIGHT NOTE *
* -------------- *
* The content contributors are responsible for any copyright violations. *
* TND, a non-profit electronic journal, will publish articles that have *
* been published in other electronic or paper journal with proper credit *
* to the original media. *
* *
******************************************************************************
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
%% %
%% END OF "THE NEPAL DIGEST". %
%% %
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jan 11 2000 - 11:16:06 CST